Iran’s Responsibility for the MV Mercer Street Attack under International Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.05Keywords:
Armed Forces; MV Mercer Street; State Responsibility; UAVsAbstract
The use of new technological developments in warfare, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones), has become a threat to international law due to the infliction of unnecessary suffering and injuries. In late July 2021, the MV Mercer Street, managed by Israeli-owned Zodiac Maritime, was attacked by three one-way drones while transiting on the high seas of Oman. In such a situation, international peace and security are threatened. Based on an investigation by U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) and all evidence available, the Group of Seven (G7) foreign ministers pointed to Iran as the state responsible for the attack. This conclusion was based on the fact that the vertical fin was identical to those seen on an Iranian-designed and manufactured one-way attack “kamikaze” UAV series. The investigations stated that Iran was actively involved. However, Iran rejected any responsibility for the attack. What is Iran’s responsibility for the MV Mercer Street incident from an international legal perspective? The research aims to determine the international legal perspective on the use of armed force. The study is normative legal research, in which the data are collected through a statutory approach and case approach. The result of the study shows Iran's responsibility is necessary for using armed drones as an advantage of new technologies that do not consider the principles of necessity and proportionality in armed conflict. Furthermore, the research provides an understanding of Iran's responsibility under international law regarding using armed forces against other states.
Downloads
References
Alberstadt, Rachel. “Drones under International Law.” Open Journal of Political Science 4, no. 4 (2014): 221–32. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2014.44023.
U.S. Department of State. “Attack on Mercer Street Vessel.” Accessed October 16, 2021. https://www.state.gov/attack-on-mercer-street-vessel/.
Aust, Anthony. Modern Treaty Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Backstrom, Alan, and Ian Henderson. “New Capabilities in Warfare: An Overview of Contemporary Technological Developments and the Associated Legal and Engineering Issues in Article 36 Weapons Reviews.” International Review of the Red Cross 94, no. 886 (2012): 483–516. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000707.
Bibi, Amna. “Iran Nuclear Deal: A Testimony Against Strategic Coercion.” CISS Insight Journal 9, no. 2 (2022): 66–85.
Bunyan, Rachel. “Incredible Images ‘Showing Huge Crater on Israeli-Linked Tanker’ Emerge After Drone Strike Killed Two as US Vows ‘Appropriate Response’ and UK Calls Iranian Ambassador to the Foreign Office.” Mail Online, 2021. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9852875/Images-showing-huge-crater-Israeli-linked-tanker-emerge-drone-strike-killed-two.html.
Carnahan, Burrus M. “Unnecessary Suffering, the Red Cross and Tactical Laser Weapons.” Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal 18, no. 4 (1996): 705–32.
CENTCOM. “U.S. Central Command Statement on the Investigation into the Attack on the Motor Tanker Mercer Street.” Accessed October 15, 2021. https://il.usembassy.gov/u-s-central-command-statement-on-the-investigation-into-the-attack-on-the-motor-tanker-mercer-street/.
Coller, Arthur Van. “Detonating the Air: The Legality of the Use of Thermobaric Weapons under International Humanitarian Law.” International Review of the Red Cross 105, no. 923 (2023): 1125–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383123000115.
Copeland, Damian, Rain Liivoja, and Lauren Sanders. “The Utility of Weapons Reviews in Addressing Concerns Raised by Autonomous Weapon Systems.” Journal of Conflict and Security Law krac035 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krac035.
Costello, Cathryn, and Itamar Mann. “Border Justice: Migration and Accountability for Human Rights Violations.” German Law Journal 21, no. 3 (2020): 311–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.27.
Crawford, James. The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Devine, Kieran, and Victoria Elms. “Maritime Wars: Did the Attack on the Mercer Street Deliberately Target Its Crew?” Sky News, 2021. https://news.sky.com/story/maritime-wars-did-the-attack-on-the-mercer-street-deliberately-target-its-crew-12371962.
Ekta, Rathore, and Biswanath Gupta. “Emergence of Jus Cogens Principles in Outer Space Law.” International Journal of Space Politics & Policy 18, no. 1 (2020): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2020.1723353.
Enemark, Christian. “On the Responsible Use of Armed Drones: The Prospective Moral Responsibilities of States.” International Journal of Human Rights 24, no. 6 (2020): 560–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1690464.
Ford, Christopher M. “Autonomous Weapons and International Law.” South Carolina Law Review 62, no. 2 (2017): 413–78.
Garcia, Denise. “Future Arms, Technologies, and International Law: Preventive Security Governance.” European Journal of International Security 1, no. 1 (2016): 109. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2015.7.
Gardam, Judith Gail. Non-Combatant Immunity as a Norma of International Humanitarian Law. London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993.
Gasser, Hans Peter. “Acts of Terror ‘Terrorism’ and International Humanitarian Law.” International Review of the Red Cross 85, no. 847 (2002): 547–70.
Gisel, Laurent, Tilman Rodenhäuser, and Knut Dörmann. “Twenty Years on: International Humanitarian Law and the Protection of Civilians Against the Effects of Cyber Operations during Armed Conflicts.” International Review of the Red Cross 102, no. 913 (2020): 287–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383120000387.
Hill-Cawthorne, Lawrence. “Rights under International Humanitarian Law.” European Journal of International Law 28, no. 4 (2017): 1187–1215. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx073.
“ICRC Customary Law Study,” n.d.
Kalshoven, F., and L. Zegveld. Constraints on the Waging of War: An Introduction to International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511995231.
Kumar, Ankit. “Drone Proliferation and Security Threats.” Indian Journal of Asian Affairs 33, no. 1 (2020): 43–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27003434.
Liivoja, Rain. “Technological Change and the Evolution of the Law of War.” International Review of the Red Cross 97, no. 900 (2015): 1157–1177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383116000424.
Lin, Herbert. “Cyber Conflict and International Humanitarian Law.” International Review of the Red Cross 94, no. 886 (2012): 515–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638311200081.
Lubell, N., and N. Derejko. “A Global Battlefield?: Drones and the Geographical Scope of Armed Conflict.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 11, no. 1 (2013): 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs096.
M, Hilton Tarnama Putra, and Jarkasi Anwar. “China Responsibility in Case of Covid 19 Pandemic Under International Law.” Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (2021): 101–13. https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v4i2.12628.
Mayer, Benoit. “Climate Change Reparations and the Law and Practice of State Responsibility.” Asian Journal of International Law 7, no. 1 (2017): 185–216.
Nichols, Michelle. “Britain Tells UN ‘Highly Likely’ Iran behind Deadly Tanker Attack,” 2021. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/britain-tells-un-highly-likely-iran-behind-deadly-tanker-attack-2021-08-03/.
“Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion,” n.d.
Octaviani, R., and S Febrian. “Penerapan Prinsip Humanitarian Intervention Sebagai Cara Penyelesaian Konflik Bersenjata Internasional Dikaitkan Dengan Kedaulatan Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis (Selisik) 4, no. 1 (2018): 54–70. https://doi.org/10.35814/selisik.v4i1.683.
UN General Assembly. “Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fifty-Third Session.” Accessed May 19, 2022. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2.
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). “Rule 70 of Customary International Humanitarian Law.” Accessed March 19, 2022. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docindex/v1_rul_rule70.
Schachter, Oscar. “The Right of States to Use Armed Forces.” Michigan Law Review 82, no. 5 (2013): 1620–46. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr.
Sehrawat, Vivek. “Legal Status of Drones Under LOAC and International Law.” Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 5, no. 1 (2017): 166–205. https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol5/iss1/7.
Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. 7th Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
SJ, Richard, and Roda Verheyen. “State Responsibility and Compensation for Climate Change Damages - a Legal and Economic Assessment.” Energy Policy 32, no. 9 (2004): 1109–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00075-2.
Tan, Alan. “The ‘Haze’ Crisis in Southeast Asia: Assessing Singapore’s Transboundary Haze Pollution Act 2014.” CALS Working Paper Series 2, no. 15 (2015): 1–44. http://law.nus.edu.sg/wps/.
Trapp, Kimberley N. “Back to Basics: Necessity, Proportionality, and the Right of Self-Defence Against Non-State Terrorist Actors.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56, no. 1 (2008): 141–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei153.
Sea Power. “U.S. Central Command Releases Statement on Investigation into Attack on Motor Tanker Mercer Street,” 2021. https://seapowermagazine.org/u-s-central-command-releases-statement-on-investigation-into-attack-on-motor-tanker-mercer-street/.
Maritime Cyprus. “US Investigation into the Attack on the Tanker M/V Mercer Street,” 2021. https://maritimecyprus.com/2021/08/09/us-investigation-into-the-attack-on-the-tanker-m-v-mercer-street/.
Wuschka, Sebastian. “The Use of Combat Drones in Current Conflicts - A Legal Issue or a Political Problem.” Goettingen Journal of International Law 3, no. 3 (2011): 891–905. https://doi.org/10.3249/1868-1581-3-3-wuschka.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Brawijaya Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
