Gashb and Itlaf Arrangements in KHES and Authority of Justice (Review of Chapter XV of Book II of KHES)

Authors

  • Sufiarina Sufiarina University of Tama Jagakarsa, South Jakarta
  • Herman Sudrajat University of Tama Jagakarsa, South Jakarta
  • Hamidullah Mahmud State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2020.007.01.09

Keywords:

sharia economics, contracts, Gashb and Itlaf, the authority of religious courts.

Abstract

As a guide for judges in the Religious Court, the Supreme Court has issued Perma No.2 of 2008 concerning the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES). It contained Gashb and Itlaf, in Book II about the Covenant, whereas Gashb and Itlaf have interpreted as deprivation and destruction. Briefly, Gashb and Itlaf seem to be an offence because of the phrase taking or destroying someone else's property. Offence in the field of Islamic economics is the absolute authority of the State Court. For this reason, it is necessary to examine whether Gashb and Itlaf included in the context of Islamic economics. It also needs to be examined whether Gashb and Itlaf are the absolute authority of the Religious Court.

Normative juridical research carried out by discussing Book II of KHES, specifically Chapter XV. It then analysed with the absolute competence of the Religious court, the provisions of Article 49 of the Law of Religious Court. The analysis complemented by a study of legal principles in Islamic economics. Comparisons also made with the concepts of legal relations in the Civil Code, especially regarding the binding and offence in the Criminal Code.

The research results of Gashb and Itlaf do not originate from the contract and do not include business activities with Islamic economic principles. Thus Gashb and Itlaf are not included in the absolute authority of the Religious Court. Gashb and Itlaf are not intended as offences because the sanctions are compensation claims. Claims are filed based on lawsuits that violate the law and become the absolute authority of the State Court. Placement of Gashb and Itlaf in KHES is wrong because it does not include Islamic economic activities, so it must have removed from KHES.

Author Biographies

Sufiarina Sufiarina, University of Tama Jagakarsa, South Jakarta

Law Department

Herman Sudrajat, University of Tama Jagakarsa, South Jakarta

Law Department

Hamidullah Mahmud, State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah

Law Department

References

Books

Ali, Zainuddin, Hukum Perbankan Syariah, (Sinar Grafika, 2nd Ed, Jakarta, 2010).

Anwar, Syamsul, Hukum perjanjian Syariah (Studi tentang teori Aqad dalam Fikih Muamalat), (PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta 2007).

Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus et.al, Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan (in order to Embrace the Purna Bakti 70 Years Age), (Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001)

Harahap, M. Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, (Sinar Grafika, 8th Ed, Jakarta, 2008).

Karim, Adiwarman, Bank Islam, Analisis Fiqih dan Keuangan, (PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 4th Ed, Jakarta, 2010)

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Kencana Prenada Media Grup, Jakarta 2009).

Muhammad, Abdulkadir, Hukum Perdata Indonesia, (Citra Aditya Bakti, 3th Ed, Bandung, 2000).

Mujahidin, Ahmad, Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia, (Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2010).

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono, Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian, (Sumur Bandung, 7th Ed, Jakarta, 1973).

Soekanto, Soerjono and Sri Mamudji, Penelitian hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, (Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2009).

Soekanto, Soerjono, Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum, (PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2005).

Sutantio, Retnowulan and Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata Teori dan Praktek, (Mandar Maju Publishing, 9th Ed, 2002).

Syahrani, Riduan, Seluk Beluk dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata, (Alumni Bandung, 2nd Ed, 2004).

Tabalujan, Benny S, Valerie Du Toit-Low, (Singapura Bisnis Law CommAsia Resources Pte Ltd, Singapore. 2003)

Zuhaili, Wahbah, Figih Imam Syafii, Mengupas Masalah Fighiyah Berdasarkan Al Qur, an dan Hadis, Vol.2, (Almahira Publishing, Jakarta, 2008).

Journal

Ahmad, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan’ (2014) II(6) Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan.

Domiri, ‘Analisis Tentang Sistem Peradilan Agama di Indonesia’, (2016) 47(43) Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 334, (ISSN: 0125-9687 (Print) E-ISSN: 2503-1465 (Online))

Haryanti, Tuti, ‘Kewenangan Peradilan Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah’ (2013) IX(1) Jurnal Tahkim.

Rahmi, Diana, ‘Ruang Lingkup Kewenangan Peradilan Agama Dalam Mengadili Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah’, (2013) 13(2) Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, P.ISSN: 1412-6303, E.ISSN: 2549-001x <https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/174> accessed March 2020.

Law

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Undang-Undang No 7 Tahun 1989, yang telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang No, 3 Tahun 2006, dan perubahan kedua dengan Undang-Undang No 50 Tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Agama

Undang-Undang 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah

Undang-Undang No. 48 tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 2 tahun 2008 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Sufiarina, Sufiarina, Herman Sudrajat, and Hamidullah Mahmud. 2020. “Gashb and Itlaf Arrangements in KHES and Authority of Justice (Review of Chapter XV of Book II of KHES)”. Brawijaya Law Journal 7 (1):129-39. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2020.007.01.09.