Legal Protection for Women Drivers in the Gig Economy: Evidence from Tulungagung, East Java

Ahmad Zulfiyan

Abstract


In patriarchal society, women tend to be vulnerable. This is caused by the existence of a hierarchical view that considers women lower position than men, even at work. This study aims to find out how the legal protection for Grab women drivers in the gig economy. The method used in this study is empirical-qualitative with a feminist approach. Data were collected through in-depth interview, literature study, and the internet. The data in this study were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model which includes data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. The results of this study showed that, in the gig economy, the relationship between Grab as an online transportation service provider and the drivers that they call 'mitra' cannot be categorized as an employment relationship. The implication is that the rights stated in Act Number 13 of 2003 concerning Labor cannot be obtained by drivers. In the context of women drivers, they face various legal protection constraints such as limited job security, double burden, gender stereotypes, and sexual harassment.

Keywords


legal protection; women drivers; gig economy; tulungagung

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett, Judith M., History Matters: Patriarchy and the Challenge of Feminism, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006).

Bharat, Shah S, “The Driver-Partner Dilemma: Structural Transformation in Indonesia’s On Demand Transportation Sector and Skills-Traps among Go-Jek and Grab Driver-Partners,” (2017) Unpublished.

Bornstein, Josh, “The Great Uber Fairness Fallacy: As a Driver, How Do You Bargain with an App?” The Guardian, 2015.

(accessed 1 June 2020).

Candraningrum, Dewi, “Karier Patriarki,” Jurnal Perempuan, 2014

(accessed 18 June 2020).

Carr, Marylin and Martha Alter Chen, “Globalization and the informal economy: how global trade and investment impact on the working poor,” (Geneva: International Labour Office, 2002).

Chen, Martha A., “Rethinking the informal economy: linkages with the formal economy and the formal regulatory environment,” DESA Working Paper No. 46, (New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2007).

Eddyono, Sri W., Women’s Empowerment in Indonesia, A Poor Community in Jakarta, (New York: Routledge, 2019).

Elson, Diane, “Recognize, Reduce, and Redistribute Unpaid Care Work: How to Close the Gender Gap,” (2017) New Labor Forum, Vol. 26, No. 2, p. 52-61.

Fakih, Mansour, Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006).

Federici, Silvia, Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, (California: PM Press, 2012).

Handayani, M.Th. and Ni Wayan Putu Artini, “Kontribusi Pendapatan Ibu Rumah Tangga Pembuat Makanan Olahan terhadap Pendapatan Keluarga,” (2009) Jurnal PIRAMIDA, Vol. 5 No. 1.

Harris, Brett, “Uber, lyft, and regulating the sharing economy,” (2017) Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 41 No. 1, hlm. 269–285.

Healy, Joshua and Et. Al., “Should we take the gig economy seriously?” (2017) Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, DOI: 10.1080/10301763.2017.1377048.

Herdiansyah, Haris, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, (Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2010).

Hunt, Abigail, and Et Al., “Women in the gig economy Paid work, care and flexibility in Kenya and South Africa.” (2019) ODI Report, November.

Husni, Lalu & Ani Suryani, “Legal Protection for Women Domestic Workers Based on The International Convention,” (2018) Journal of Legal, Ethical, and Regulatory, Vol. 21 No. 2.

Izzati, Nabiyla R., “The Changing Concept of Work in Gig Economy: Case of Go-Jek Driver and Its Social Protection,” (2018) Proceeding of International Conference on Population and Social Policy in a Disrupted World, p. 50-69.

Mambu, Joupy G. Z., “Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Wanita (Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003),” (2010) de Jure: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 2, p. 150-161.

Mollick, Ethan R. and Nancy Rothbard, “Mandatory Fun: Consent, Gamification and the Impact of Games at Work,” (2014) The Wharton School Research Paper Series.

Mulia, Siti M., Ensiklopedia Mulimah Reformis, Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran untuk Reinterpretasi dan Aksi, (Jakarta: Dian Rakyat, 2019).

Nastiti, Aulia, “Cerita pengemudi menguak eksploitasi Gojek, Grab, dan Uber, The Conversation, 2017 (accessed 15 August 2020).

Ariefana, Pebriansyah and Achmad Fauzi, “Aturan Baru, Kemenhub Minta Grab dan Go-Jek Kasih BPJS ke Driver,” Suara.com, 2019,

(accessed 15 August 2020).

Tjaja, Ratna P., “Wanita Bekerja dan Implikasi Sosial,” (2000) Jurnal Naskah No. 20.

Valenduc, Gerard and Patricia Vendramin, “Work in the digital economy: sorting the old from the new,” (2016) Working Paper.

Wargadiredja, Arzia T., Penyebab Pengendara Ojek Perempuan Rutin Ditolak Penumpang, VICE, 2017

(accessed 2 August 2020).

Woodcock, Jamie and Mark Graham, The Gig Economy; A Critical Introduction, (Polity

Press: Cambridge, 2020).

Yappy, Shierly N., Pekerja Gig dan Ekonomi Gig, Jawapos, 2020

(accessed 19 July 2020).

Legislations:

Civil Code

Regulation of the Minister of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia Number PM 12 of 2019 concerning Safety Protection of Motorcycle Users Used for Public Interest

Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage

Law Number 7 of 1984 concerning Ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women

Act Number 13 of 2003 concerning Labor

Interviews:

Interview with AY, 4/2/2020

Interview with AW, 29/1/2020

Interview with DW, 29/1/2020

Interview with EM, 4/2/2020

Interview with HVF, 4/2/2020

Interview with Nabiyla Risfa Izzati, 26/2/2020

Interview with NRM, 29/1/2020

Interview with TS, 5/2/2020




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2020.007.02.05

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.