Criminal Law Enforcement of Indonesian Commerce Act Number 7 the Year 2014 for Corporation Perpetrators: Why It Will Be Difficult

Authors

  • Alfons Zakaria Brawijaya University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.02.01

Keywords:

corporate crime, corporation, corporate criminal responsibility.

Abstract

Indonesian laws have recognized the legal person as a subject of criminal law. It can be seen in all regulations enacted recently acknowledging that “any person†is a natural person (natuurlijk persoon) and legal person (rechtspersoon) who are liable for criminal punishments. Related to legal person or corporation, Indonesia, on the other hand, regulates corporate criminal responsibility differently in every single law. Some laws contain complete provisions, but others may fail to set the regulation properly. The Indonesian Commerce Act Number 7 the year 2014, for example, the legislators might miss drawing the provisions regulating corporate criminal responsibility. The Act recognizes corporations as a legal subject, but there is the absence of provisions related to when corporations shall be categorized committing a crime, which party shall be responsible when corporations shall be responsible, and what punishments shall be proper for corporations. Furthermore, it is commonly used, that if there is an absence of criminal law provisions in an act, the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code will be the referral sources. In terms of corporate criminal responsibility regulation, however, both the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code do not recognize the corporation as the subject of criminal law. Thus, the codes may not suitable as the referral sources for corporate crime law. Unfortunately, corporations violating the Act, then, will be difficult to be enforced in the judicial process. As a legal research paper, it will argue that the absence of the provision related to corporate criminal responsibility leads to the failure of law enforcement of corporation wrongdoings by presenting prospective consequences of the absence of such provisions.

References

Anderson, James M. and Waggoner, Ivan, The Changing Role of Criminal Law in Controlling Corporate Behavior, 2014, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif

Andi Hamzah, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 1994

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2007, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta

Corporations and Financial Services Division of The Australian Treasury, Review of Sanctions in Corporate Law, http://archive.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?ContentID=1182,

Debra A. Valentine, Pyramid Schemes, https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/1998/05/pyramid-schemes

Dwidja Priyatno, Kebijakan Legislasi Tentang Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Di Indonesia, CV.Utomo, Bandung, 2004

Fajrimei A. Gofar, Asas Legalitas Dalam Rancangan KUHP 2005, ELSAM, Jakarta, 2005

Hamzah Hatrik, Asas Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Strict Liability dan Vicarious Liability), Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1996,

Mahrus Ali, Kejahatan Korporasi, Arti Bumi Intaran,Yogyakarta, 2008

Moeljatno, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2002

Muladi and Diah Sulityani, 2015, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Alumni, Bandung

Setiawan Noerdajasakti, Ismail Navianto, dan Alfons Zakaria, 2015, Kendala Penegekan Hukum Kejahatan Korpoasi Terkait Inkonsistensi Pengaturan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia, Studi di Jawa Timur, Research Report, Faculty of Law Brawijaya University.

Setiyono, Kejahatan Korporasi, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2009,

Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2012,

Sudarto, Hukum Pidana I, Yayasan Sudarto, Semarang, 1990

Weissmann, Andrew and Newman, David, 2007, Rethinking Criminal

Corporate Liability, Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 82

Jerome Hall, General Principles of Criminal Law Second Edition, 2010, the Lawbook Exchange Ltd.

Gerhard Werle, Florian Jeßberger, Principles of International Criminal Law Third Edition , 2014, Oxford University Press

William Robert Thomas, How and Why Should the Criminal Law Punish Corporations?, Dissertation, the University of Michigan, 2015, https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/113460/wrtrw_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Kenneth S. Gallant, The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law, 2009, Cambridge University Press

Ridho Kurniawan and Siti Nurul Intan Sari, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Berdasarkan Asas Strict Liability, Jurnal Yuris Vol. 1 No. 2 Desember 2014

Henry Donald Lbn. Toruan, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korupsi Korporasi, Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Volume 3 Nomor 3 Desember 2014

Padil, Karakteristik Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal IUS Volume 4 Nomor 1 2016

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Ajaran Pemidanaan: Tindak Pidana Korporasi & Seluk beluknya, Kencana, Depok, 2017

Dwidja Priyatna, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Kebijakan Legislasi, Kencana, Depok, 2017

Dwidja Priyatno and Kristian, Kebijakan Formulasi Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta 2017

Downloads

Published

2019-10-31

How to Cite

Zakaria, Alfons. 2019. “Criminal Law Enforcement of Indonesian Commerce Act Number 7 the Year 2014 for Corporation Perpetrators: Why It Will Be Difficult”. Brawijaya Law Journal 6 (2):129-40. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.02.01.