Strengthening Indonesia’s Strategic Trade Management Regulation Against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

Authors

  • Hadi Rahmat Purnama Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rizky Banyualam Permana Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Arie Afriansyah Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2024.011.01.01

Keywords:

International Trade, Strategic Trade Management, WMD

Abstract

International law governing the control of WMD proliferation cannot solely focus on state actors but must also include non-state actors. To address the risks and combat the proliferation of WMD by non-state actors through the ordinary course of trade, the UNSC issued Resolution 1540, which contains the obligation to adopt domestic policies to prevent WMD proliferation. Indonesia has a legal obligation to comply with and implement this resolution under international law. This paper discusses the need assessment for Indonesia to enact a solid regulatory framework to implement Strategic Trade Management (STM). This paper questions how STM regulations are governed in the Indonesian context presently and how they should be regulated better to accommodate contemporary dynamics. This study is a legal and policy study involving literature review or desk research. Literature review involves gathering data and information such as literary texts, policy papers, legislative regulations, and other relevant documents.  This study finds that even though Indonesia had already implemented some form of STM policy through export-import control and restriction (larangan dan pembatasan), it still left out the gap in properly regulating dual-use goods. Strategic goods regulation in Indonesian legislation is not intended in the context of dual-use goods, as export/import restrictions are designed to enhance Indonesia’s product competitiveness and market expansion, both domestically and internationally, increase the capabilities of exporters/importers, and enhance national product development and innovation. Implementation of STM policy One of the objectives that can be achieved is maintaining national security, especially in providing a sense of security for the Indonesian people and businesses. Implementing STM will also benefit businesses by reducing the risk of financial losses, such as being involved in export/import transactions prohibited by other countries or even by Indonesia. Moreover, by implementing STM, it is not unlikely that investment from countries with high technology will increase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“About The NSG.” Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), accessed November 9, https://www.nuclearsuppliersgroup.org/en/about-nsg.

“Australia Group.” Arms Control Association, https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/australiagroup.

“Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR): Manfaat Dan Konsekuensi Keanggotaan Indonesia.” Accessed November 19, 2023, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343564010_Missile_Technology_Control_Regime_MTCR_Manfaat_Dan_Konsekuensi_Keanggotaan_Indonesia.

“The Hafnium Bomb: Nuclear Grenade & the Pentagon’s Imaginary Weapons.” Accessed on Medium, https://medium.com/predict/the-hafnium-bomb-nuclear-grenade-the-pentagons-imaginary-weapons-35ceee784338.

“United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540.” United Nations, un.org, accessed November 19, 2023, https://www.un.org/en/sc/1540/about-1540-committee/general-information.shtml.

Adilansyah, Aini Annisya, and Adi Hidayat Argubi. “Terorisme di Bima: Kajian Perubahan Perilaku Individu Biasa Menjadi Teroris (Terrorism in Bima: A Study on the Behavioral Transformation of Ordinary Individuals into Terrorists)” In Proceedings of Seminar Nasional Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala, September 29, 2018, 25–44.

Chia, Ken et al. “Singapore Tightens Strategic Goods Controls.” Accessed November 25, 2023, https://www.internationaltradecomplianceupdate.com/2020/08/17/singapore-tightens-strategic-goods-controls/.

Diokno, Jenny Puno. “Strengthening Inter-Agency Cooperation and Coordination in the Implementation of the Strategic Trade Management Act with a View to Enhancing Trade Facilitation: A Philippine Customs Perspective.” World Customs Journal (2023): 99-110.

European Union. Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items.

Førland, Tor Egil. “‘Economic Warfare’ and ‘Strategic Goods’: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing COCOM.” Journal of Peace Research 28, no. 2 (1991): 191–204.

Fuhrmann, Matthew. “Exporting Mass Destruction? The Determinants of Dual-Use Trade.” Journal of Peace Research 45, no. 5 (2008): 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343308094324.

Gahlaut, Seema. “United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 Implementation: More of the Same or Brave New World?” Strategic Trade Review 5, no. 7 (Winter 2019): 53–66.

Hrynkiv, Olga. “Export Controls and Securitization of Economic Policy: Comparative Analysis of the Practice of the United States, the European Union, China, and Russia.” Journal of World Trade 56, no. 4 (2022): 633–656.

Indonesia. Law No. 17 of 2006 on Customs.

Indonesia. Ministry of Trade Regulation 20 of 2021.

Indonesia. Law No.7 of 2014.

Kareem, Mohammed Shahabar Abdul. “Implementation and Enforcement of Strategic Trade Controls in Malaysia.” Strategic Trade Review, no. 2 (Spring 2016): 104-117.

Mahfoud, Tara, Christine Aicardi, Saheli Datta, and Nikolas Rose. “The Limits of Dual Use.” Issues in Science and Technology vol. 34, no. 4 (2018): 73–78.

Malaya, J. Eduardo, and Therese M. Alders. “Banning the 'Poor Man's' Weapons of Mass Destruction: The Philippines in the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.” Ateneo Law Journal 66 (2022): 741–800.

Nayan, Rajiv. Global Strategic Trade Management: How India Adjusts Its Export Control System for Accommodation in the Global System. New Delhi: Springer India, 2019.

Pabelina, Karla Mae G. “The Strategic Trade Management Regime in the Philippines.” Strategic Trade Review, no. 2 (Spring 2016): 118–129.

Pontoh, Otniel. “Penangkapan Ikan dengan Bom di Daerah Terumbu Karang Desa Arakan dan Wawontulap (Fishing with Bombs in the Coral Reef Areas of Arakan and Wawontulap Villages).” Jurnal Perikanan dan Kelautan Tropis 7, no. 1 (2011): 57.

Rachmianto, Andy. “Indonesia’s Approach to Strategic Trade Controls: The Perspective of a Developing and Archipelagic Country.” Strategic Trade Review 2, no. 2 (2016): 130–139.

Shaikenova, Anar. “Kazakhstan’s Law 'On Control of Specific Goods': Balancing Economic Development Goals and International Nonproliferation Obligations.” Journal of Strategic Trade Control 1 (June 2023): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.25518/2952-7597.83.

Tan, George. “Singapore’s Journey Towards Its Implementation of Strategic Trade Controls.” Strategic Trade Review, no. 2 (Spring 2016): 90–91.

United Nations, Permanent Mission of Indonesia to the United Nations. “National Submission of Indonesia.” New York: UN Headquarters, 2004.

United Nations, Permanent Mission of Indonesia to the United Nations. “National Submission of Indonesia.” New York: UN Headquarters, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-21

How to Cite

Purnama, Hadi Rahmat, Rizky Banyualam Permana, and Arie Afriansyah. 2024. “Strengthening Indonesia’s Strategic Trade Management Regulation Against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction”. Brawijaya Law Journal 11 (1):1-26. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2024.011.01.01.