Modern Justice: Indonesia’s Supreme Court’s Challenges to Uphold Fair Trial Principles Through Digitalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.07Keywords:
Court; Digitalization; Fair Trial; Judges; SocietyAbstract
As we have seen, it is essential to widen digitization in order to bestow better access to public information contained in Indonesian courts for a variety of purposes. Court modernization through digitization benefits not only the judges but also both attorneys and litigants. To this end, Indonesia’s Supreme Court has progressed above and beyond to embody the principle of equality before the law by integrating technological development into the judicial process with. In fact, qualified policies do not always govern the implementation of technology, resulting in discrepancies between policy and implementation. Using a statutory, case, and historical approach, these article will assess whether it is reasonable and efficient to adopt this technology in Indonesian courts. Qualified implementing regulations and tiered socialization have not been utilized in the judicial context to support law enforcement’s readiness to carry out the judicial process electronically. This article further addresses the safety of personal and judicial data, and the security of electronic court proceedings, bearing in mind that applications of information technology should be considerate of the community’s need for access to justice as well as the court’s interests in preserving its authority. Nonetheless, given that technology has already been implemented to enhance access, a variety of actions aimed at bolstering both policy issuance and reforming the technological infrastructure will encourage the court to conduct trials in a safe and sound manner.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, Daron. “A Theory of Equality Before the Law.” The Economic Journal, 2020, 1429. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa116.
Allan, T.R.S. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. UK: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Atur, Ifah. “Sistem Informasi Perkara: Menuju Transparansi Badan Peradilan.” Mahkamah Agung, 2013. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/assets/majalah/Majalah_MA_Edisi2/.
Bingham, Thomas Henry. The Rule of Law. United Kingdom: Allen Lane, 2010.
Black, Julia. “Critical Reflections on Regulation.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 1 (2002).
Burri, Mira, and Rahel Schar. “The Reform of the UE Data Protection Framework: Outlining Key Changes and Assessing Their Fitness for a Data-Driven Economy.” Journal of Information Policy 6 (2016): 479–511. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.0479.
Busser, Els De. “The Conflict Between Protecting Privacy and Securing Nations.” Big Data: A Twenty-First Century Arms Race, 2017. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep03719.5.
Chou, Yacine Atif and Chien. “Digital Citizenship: Innovations in Education, Practice and Pedagogy.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2018, 152–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26273876.
European Union. “Circular Information from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions, Digitalisation of Justice in the European Union.” Accessed February 25, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/communication_digitalisation_en.pdf.
Center for Transparency and Privacy (CTAP) Maine, Maine Court. “Electronic Court Record Access Rules Considered by Court Rules Committee Members,” 2020. https://perma.cc/4TKB-GJU7.
Engin, Zeynep. “Algorithmic Government: Automating Public Services and Supporting Civil Servants in Using Data Science Technologies.” The Computer Journal 62, no. 3 (2019): 448–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxy082.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Memaknai Salus Populis Suprema Lex.” Majalah Konstitusi, 2020.
Farber, Daniel A. “The Rule of Law and the Law of Precedents.” In Minnesota Law Review, 1173–82, 2005.
Forsyth, Miranda. A Bird That Flies with Two Wings. Australia: ANU Press, 2009.
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.
Guffin, Peter J. “Digital Court Records Access: Social Justice and Judicial Balancing.” Maine Law Review 72, no. 1 (2020): 88–93. https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr/vol72/iss1/4.
Hannan, Mohammad Abdul, and Md. Arifuzzaman. “Separation of Judiciary and Judicial Independence in Bangladesh: An Appraisal.” Open Access Library Journal 8 (2021): 2–21. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107002.
Hazelhorst, Monique. Civil Judgments in the European Union and the Right to a Fair Trial. Netherland: Asser Press, 2017.
Indonesia, Mahkamah Agung Republik. “Cetak Biru Pembaruan Peradilan 2010-2035.” Jakarta, 2010. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/media/198.
Katsh, M. Ethan, and Orna Rabinovich-Einy. Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Koulu, Riikka. Law, Technology and Dispute Resolution. New York: Routledge, 2018.
Kusdarini, Eny. Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: UNY Press, 2019.
Manusia, Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi. “Komentar Umum Kovenan Internasional Hak Sipil Dan Politik – Kovenan Internasional Hak Ekonomi Sosial Budaya.” Jakarta, 2009. https://www.komnasham.go.id/files/1480577941-komentar-umum-kovenan-hak-sipil-$XHHPA.pdf.
Moore, Sally Falk. “The Production of Cultural Pluralism as A Process.” Public Culture 1, no. 2 (1989): 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-1-2-26.
Moses, Lyria Bennet, and Monika Zalnieriute. “Law and Technology in the Dimension of Time.” UNSW Law Research No. 19-75, 2019. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3461408.
Mulgan, Richard. Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies. New York: International Commission of Jurist, 1959.
Nakad-Weststrate, H.W.R. Henriette, A.W. (Ton) Jongbloed, H.J. (Jaap) van den Herik, and Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem. “Digitally Produced Judgements in Modern Courts.” International Journal of Digital Society 6, no. 4 (2015): 1102–10.
Olga Zhurkina, Elena Filippova, Tatiana Bochkareva. “Digitalization of Legal Proceedings: Global Trends.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Conference “Legal Regulation of the Digital Economy and Digital Relations: Problems and Prospects of Development” (LARDER 2020), 2021. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210318.018.
Pratiwi, Cekli Setya. Penjelasan Hukum Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2016.
Salevao, Iutisone. Rule of Law, Legitimate Governance & Development in the Pacific. Australia: ANU Press, 2005. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbhxk.6.
Sudbeck, Lynn E. “Placing Court Records Online: Balancing the Public and Private Interests.” The Justice System Journal 27, no. 3 (2006): 268–85. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27977302.
Sulistyono, Adi, and Isharyanto. Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2018.
Tep, Sandrine Prom, Florence Millerand Alexandra Parada, Alexandra Bahary, Pierre Noreu, and Anne-Marie Santorineos. “Legal Information in Digital Form: The Challenge of Accessing Computerized Court Record.” Annual Review of Interdisciplinary Justice Research 8 (2019): 217–44.
Tranter, Kieran. “The Laws of Technology and the Technology of Law.” Griffith Law Review, 2011, 753–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2011.10854719.
Ulman, Gary. Digital Technology: The Future of Law and Innovation in the Profession. The Law Society of New South Wales, 2017.
Warren, Samuel, and Louis Brandeis. “The Right to Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 193 (1890): 4.
Zavalniuk, Ihor. “Realization of the Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial in the Context of the Pandemic-Economic Crisis.” Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 8, no. 3 (2022): 72–77. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-3-72-77.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Brawijaya Law Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.