Institutional Policy in Land Procurement Under The Omnibus Law Regime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2020.007.01.02Abstract
The legal culture procedure with socio-legal analysis will be able to answer the fundamental questions in the problems of practices of land procurement for public interests, in particular the issue of compensation. The crucial issue of compensation within the implementation of the policy of land procurement regards the non-equivalence of land value, both utility value and economic value of structures and landscapes, to the monetary compensation. The use of the legal culture approach is to provide answers and implement them to resolve issues of land procurement for public interests in the omnibus law regime to maintain justice to landowners and preserve the environment. The correlation of the cultural approach and activities of land procurement is that culture refers to the target of the national conscience, and the cultural approach based on the growth mindset will result in wisdom and nobility of the decisions of public officials to prioritize the people rather than interests of investment. The government must choose to renegotiate the policy of enacting the Law of Employment Creation, which is judged by the greater public to conflict with the spirit and mandate of the Preamble and contents of the 1945 Constitution. It needs renegotiation between the state and people by discussing in-depth the legal substance of the law is not performed, and then the law in question must have its enactment firmly rejected.References
Books and Report
Bernstein, Henry, Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change (Hallifax: Fernwood, 2010).
Boen, Billy, Young on Top, 30 Rahasia Sukses di Usia Muda [Young on Top: 30 Secrets of Success at a Young Age], (TransMedia, Jakarta, 2009).
Donovan, James M., Legal Anthropology, An Introduction (Alta Mira Press, Lanham, UK, 2008).
Friedman, Lawrence M, The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, (New York: Russel sage Foundation, 1977).
Hadjon, Philipus M et al., Hukum Administrasi dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi [Administration Law and Crimes of Corruption], Second Printing, (Gadjah Mada University Press, 2nd Printing, Yogyakarta, 2012).
Irianto, Sulistyawati, Pendidikan Hukum Untuk Indonesia Masa Depan: Sebuah Catatan Kritis [Legal Education for a Future Indonesia: A Critical Remark], (Scientific Oration, Open Senate Meeting for the 74th Anniversary of the Faculty of Law of Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, 2020).
Kasali, Rhenald, Strawberry Generation, Mengubah Generasi Rapuh Menjadi Tangguh [Strawberry Generation: Changing a Fragile Generation to a Strong Generation], (Rumah Perubahan dan Mizan, Jakarta, 2017).
Koentjaraningrat, Kebudayaan, Mentalitet dan Pembangunan [Culture, Mentality, and Development], (Gramedia, 3rd Printing, Jakarta, 2016).
Liam, Murphy and Thomas Nagel, The Myth of Ownership, (Oxford University Press, First Printing, New York, 2002)
McCoubrey, Hilaire, Nigel D White, 1996, Textbook on Jurisprudence, (Blackstone Press Limited, Second Edition, Glasgow).
McLeod, Ian, Legal Teory (Palgrave Macmillan, 4th Ed, New York, 2007).
MD, Mohammad Mahfud, Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi [Constructing Legal Politics, Upholding the Constitution], (Rajawali Pers, 2nd Printing, Jakarta, 2011).
Notonagoro, Beberapa Hal Mengenai Falsafah Pancasila [Several Matters Regarding the Pancasila Philosophy], (Speech for the First Anniversary of Pancasila University, Djakarta, Eighth Printing, Pantjuran Tudjuh, Djakarta, 1979).
Pena, Tim Prima, n.d., Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia [Complete Dictionary of the Indonesian Language], (First Printing, Gita Media Press, n.p.).
Rawls, John, 1999, A Theory of Justice, (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Revised Edition, USA, 1999).
Tauhid, Mochammad, Masalah Agraria Sebagai Masalah Penghidupan dan Kemakmuran Rakyat Indonesia [Agrarian Affairs as an Issue of Livelihood and Prosperity of Indonesian People], Book One, (Bina Desa Foundation, Fourth Printing, Jakarta, 2011).
Setyowati, Agnes, Cultural Studies: Sebuah Pengantar, Teori dan Konsep [Cultural Studies: An Introduction, Theories, and Concepts], (Mitra Wacana Media, Bogor, 2019).
Sumardjono, Maria Sriwulani, Himpunan Kasus Beberapa Masalah Tanah [Compilation of Several Land Issue Cases], (Department of Agrarian Law, Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, First Printing, Yogyakarta, 1982).
Sumardjono, Maria SW, Kebijakan Pertanahan Antara Regulasi dan Implementasi [Land Policies Between Regulation and Implementation], (Buku Kompas, Revised Edition, Jakarta, 2005).
Wahono, Francis, Ekonomi Politik Daulat Rakyat: Pancasila Sebagai Acuan Paradigma, (Buku KOMPAS, 1st Ed, Jakarta, 2020)
Wicaksono, Aditya et al., Meretas Kembali Jalan Panjang Pertanahan di Indonesia [Re-Exposing the Long History of Land Affairs in Indonesia], (Center of Research and Development of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency, Jakarta, 2014).
Law
Indonesia Constitution 1945.
Law No. 5 of the Year 1960 on basic Fundamental of Agrarian.
Law No. 2 of the Year 2012 on Land Procurement for Development.
Law No. 20 of the Year 1961.
Minister of Domestic Affairs Regulation No. 15 of the Year 1975.
Presidential Regulation No. 71 of the Year 2012 on the Organization of Land Procurement for Development for Public Interests
Presidential Decree No. 55 of the Year 1993 on the Procurement of Land for Conducting Development for Public Interests.
Presidential Regulation No. 63 of the Year 2013 on the National Land Agency, Presidential Regulation No. 63 of the Year 2013.
Presidential Regulation No. 71 of the Year 2012 on the Organization of Land Procurement for Development for Public Interests.
Journal
Anugrah, Iqra, ‘Persoalan Agraria dan Demokrasi di Indonesia’ [Agrarian Affairs and Democracy in Indonesia], (2019) 38(3) Jurnal Prisma.
Dodek, A Adam M., ‘Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations’, (2017) 48(1) Ottawa Law Review.
Kartodihardjo, Hariadi and Sudarsono Soedomo, ‘Area Regime and the Politics of Its Usage Reallocation: A Historical, Management, Institutional, and Bureaucratic Overview’ [Rezim Kawasan dan Politik Realokasi Penggunaannya: Tinjauan Historis, Tatakelola, Institusi dan Birokrasi], (paper for the National Symposium of Agrarian Reform Implies Forestry Reform, organized by IPB, ForciDeV dan FOReTIKA, Jakarta, 2020).
Massicotte, Louis, Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice, (Canadian Parliamentary Review/Spring 2013).
Yusuf, Ria Mardiana and Muh Guntur, Menuju Kepemimpinan Yang Berkeadilan Sosial [Towards Leadership with Social Justice], in Jurnal Keadilan Sosial, First Edition: Antara Keadilan Sosial dan Keadilan Hukum [Between Social Justice and Legal Justice], ILRC and OCI, Jakarta, 2010).
News paper
Arsyad, Idham, ‘Sesat Pikir RUU Pengadaan Tanah’ [Misguided Views of the Land Procurement Bill], Kompas, (Friday, March 18, 2011).
Editorial, ‘Ancaman Hak Atas Tanah’ [Threat to Land Rights], Kompas, (Friday, March 11, 2011).
Kesowo, Bambang, Jalan Tengah Untuk RUU Cipta Kerja [A Middle Path for the Proposed Law on Employment Creation], Kompas, (March 6, 2020).
Indrati, Maria Farida, Omnibus Law, Undang-undang Sapu Jagat? [Omnibus Law: A Law of Everything?], Kompas, (January 4, 2020).
