The Shifting of Alternative Dispute Resolution: from Traditional Form to the Online Dispute Resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.01.02Keywords:
digital justice, online dispute resolution, alternative dispute resolution.Abstract
The emergence of disruptive technologies has transformed how the conflict is resolved. If Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has been understood as a more efficient method of resolving dispute than through the court, then in line with the development of technologies, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) considered as the most efficient mechanism in ADR. Through ODR, access barriers are reduced, effectiveness increases, software becomes smarter and some ADR elements are challenged. This article focuses on the shifting of dispute resolution from the traditional approach to the new generation one which called digital justice.
References
Book
Cormen, Thomas H., et al., Introduction to Algorithms (MIT Press, 2001).
Katsh, Ethan M and Janet Rifkin, Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflict in Cyberspace (Jossey Bass, 2001).
Katsh, Ethan and Orna Rabinovich-Einy, Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Dispute (Oxford University Press, 2017).
Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Thomas Schultz, Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges for Contemporary Justice (Kluwer Law International, 2004).
Knuth, Donald E., The Art of Computer Programming: Fundamental Algorithms (Addison-Wesley, 1968).
Koulu, Riikka, Dispute Resolution and Technology: Revisiting the Justification of Conflict Management (University of Helsinki Conflict Management Institute, 2016).
Lodder, A. R. and J. Zeleznikow, Enhanced Dispute Resolution Through the Use of Information Technology, (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Palmerini, Erica ‘The Interplay between Law and Technology, or the RoboLaw Project in Context’, in Erica Palmerini, Elettra Stradella, Law and Technology: The Challenge of Regulating Technological Developments (Pisa University Press, 2013).
Rijgersberg, Rudolf W., The State of Interdependence: Globalization, Internet and Constitutional Governance (TMC Asser Press, 2010).
Rule, Online Dispute Resolution for Business. B2B, E-Commerce, Consumer, Employment, Insurance, and Other Commercial Conflict (Jossey-Bass, 2002).
Schultz, Thomas, Information Technology and Arbitration: A Practitioner’s Guide (TKluwer Law International, 2006).
Thibaut, John & Laurens Walker, Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1975).
Vilalta, ‘ODR and E-Commerce’ in Mohammed S. Abdel Wahab, Ethan Katsh, and Daniel Rainey (Eds), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice. A Treatise on Technological and Dispute Resolution (Eleven International Publishing, 2012).
Wahab, Mohamed S Abdel, Ethan Katsh, and Daniel Rainey, ‘Introduction’, in Mohamed S Abdel Wahab, Ethan Katsh and Daniel Rainey (Eds), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice. A Treatise on Technology and Dispute Resolution (Eleven International Publishing, 2012).
Journal
Alexander, Nadja ‘Mobile Mediation: How Technology is Driving the Globalization of ADR’ (2006) 27(2) Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy. <http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1879>
Bower, J.L. & C.M. Christensen, ‘Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave’, (1995) 73(1) Harvard Business Review.
Brescia, Raymond H., ‘What We Know and Need to Know about Disruptive Innovation’, (2016) 67 South Carolina Law Review.
Diakopoulos, Nicholas, ‘Algorithmic Accountability: Journalistic Investigation of Computational Power Structures’, (2015) 3 Digital Journalism.
Franks, Mary Anne, ‘Justice beyond Dispute’, (2018) 131 Harvard Law Review.
Gangl, Amy, ‘Procedural Justice Theory and Evaluation of Lawmaking Process’, (2003) 25(119) Pol. Behav.
Katyal, N., ‘Disruptive Technologies and the Law’, (2014) 102 Geo L. J..
Katsh, Ethan and Leah Wing, ‘Ten Years of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Looking at the Past and Constructing the Future’ (2006) 38(19) University of Toledo Law Review.
Katsh, Ethan M., ‘Dispute Resolution in Cyberspace’ (1996) 28 Connecticut Law Review.
Lodder, Arno R., ‘The Third Party and Beyond. An Analysis of the Different Parties, in Particular the Fifth, Involved in Online Dispute Resolution’ (2006) 15(2) Information & Communications Technology Law.
Mania, Karolina, ‘Online Dispute Resolution: The Future of Justice’ (2015) 1 International Comparative Jurisprudence.
Nauss Exon, Susan, ‘The Next Generation of Online Dispute Resolution: The Significance of Holography to Enhance and Transform Dispute Resolution’ (2010) 12(19) Cardozo J. of Conflict Resolution.
Panteli, Niki & Patrick Dawson, ‘Video Conferencing Meetings: Changing Patterns of Business Communication’, (2001) 2 (16) New Tech., Work & Emp.
Qutieshat, Enas, ‘Online Dispute Resolution’, (2017) British Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 18 (2). Available at: <http://www.ajournal.co.uk/HSpdfs/HSvolume18(2)/HSVol.18%20(2)%20Article%202.pdf.>
Rabinovich-Einy, Orna and Ethan Katsh, ‘Digital Justice: Reshaping Boundaries in an Online Dispute Resolution Environment’ (2014) 1(1) International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution.
Rabinovich-Einy, Orna & Ethan Katsh, ‘Access to Digital Justice: Fair and Efficient Progress for the Modern Age’, (2017) 18 Cardozo J. of Conflict Resolution.
Sela, Ayelet, ‘The Effect of Online Technologies on Dispute Resolution System Design: Antecedents, Current Trends and Future Directions’, (2017) 21(3) Lewis & Clark Law Review.
Simpson, Brian, ‘Disrupting Technology, Disruptive Norms: The Role of Laws in A Digital World’, (2017) 26(1) Information & Communications Technology Law.
Sturm, Susan & Howard Gadlin, ‘Conflict Resolution and Systemic Change’, (2007) 1 J. Disp. Resol.
Vannieuwnhuyse, Gauthier, ‘Arbitration and New Technologies: Mutual Benefits’, (2018) 35(1) Journal of International Arbitration.
Proceeding, Internet
Andrade, Francisco, et al, ‘Using BATNAs and WATNAs in Online Dispute Resolution’ in Kumiyo Nakakoji, Yohei Murakami, Eric McCready (Eds.), New Frontier in Artificial Intelligence, JSAI-isAI 2009 Workshops LENLS, JURISIN, KCSD, LLLL, Tokyo, Japan, November 2009.
Peruginelli, G. & G. Chiti, ‘Artificial Intelligence in Alternative Dispute Resolution’, in G. Sartor (Eds), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Law of Electronic Agent (LEA02) (2002). <http://www.cirfid.unibo.it/~lea- 02/online.html>.
Katsh, Ethan M., ‘The Online Ombuds Office: Adapting Dispute Resolution to Cyberspace’ (1996) <https://www.umass.edu/dispute/ncair/katsh.htm#fn1>.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
