Arbitration and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution for Commercial Dispute (Reviewed from the Strengths of ADR and Decision of Arbitration)


  • Suherman Suherman UPN Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia



alternative dispute resolution, arbitration, enforcement of a judgement


Arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) can be used as an option for parties who conduct commercial transactions. This research is crucial to analyse what is the best dispute method for parties to be able to resolve their commercial business disputes. It is argued that the most important of ADR is the efficiency and effectivines in relation to the enforcement of a judgement on the commercial dispute especially foreign arbitral award.

This research also seeks to analyse strengths and weaknesses of each ADR method because it is very important to know in resolving disputes in the field of trade and also related to the implementation of decisions, especially in foreign arbitral award and how to improve decisions and applied in Indonesia in relation to commercial dispute. The research method used in this research is normative juridical consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, which were collected by conducting a literature review and interview technique and then processed qualitatively according to the problems and the theoretical framework logically and systematically to achieve the objective of this research, namely finding the best alternative dispute resolution in commercial dispute resolution in business transactions.

This paper argued that while each of ADR method has their own strengths and weaknesses, business actors mostly prefer too have arbitration method as their ADR method in solving their disputes. However,the applying mechanism of foreign arbitration awards need further attention from Indonesian government.

Author Biography

Suherman Suherman, UPN Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia

Faculty of Law, UPN Veteran Jakarta



Abdurrasyid, Priyatna, Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (Fikahati aneska, 2nd Ed, 2011).

American Arbitration Association, Handbook on Arbitration Practice, (JurisNet, LLC, 2010)

American Arbitration Association, HandBook on International Arbitration and ADR (JurisNett,LLC, 2nd edition, 2010)

A. Taylor, Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Mediation, (A Mediator’s Handbook, 1993)

Black, Henry Campbell, Black’s Law Dictionary, (The law Exchange, Ltd, 1991).

Boulle, Laurance, Mediation Principles Process Practice, (Sydney Butterworths, 1996).

Chen, Understanding Chinese Negotiation, (Australian Dispute Journal, 1993)

J Fulton, MaxwellCommercial Alternative Dispute Resolution, (The Law Book Company Limited, Sydney, 1989)

J. Murray, A Rau and E Sherman, Process of Dispute Resolution ; The Role of Lawyers, (Foundation Press, 1989)

Loh Sze On Sc, Quentin and Lee Peng Khoon, Edwin, Confidentiality in Arbitration : How far Does it extand, (Academy Publishing, 2007)

Maddux, Robert, Successful Negotiation, (London sweet and maxwell, 1988).

PMB. Rowland, Arbitration Law and Practice, (Butterworths, 2nd ed, 1990)

Cole, Sarah Rudolph managerial Litigation? The Overlooked Problem of Party Autonomy in Dispute Resolutio, (Hastings L.J, 2000)

Sammartano, Rubino, International Arbitration Law, (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1990)

Sherman, Rau and Murray, Processes of Dispute Resolution, (Foundation Press, 1989)

Journals Articles

Shavel, Steven, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution : An Economic Analysis’, (1995) 24 (1, January) The Journal of Legal Studies


The 1958 New York Convention Regarding the Recognition and Implementation of International Arbitration

Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 1990 concerning Procedures for the Implementation of Foreign Arbirase Decisions

Presidential Decree 34 of 1981




How to Cite

Suherman, Suherman. 2019. “Arbitration and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution for Commercial Dispute (Reviewed from the Strengths of ADR and Decision of Arbitration)”. Brawijaya Law Journal 6 (1):104-14.